汉语名词动用中的句法机制研究 本书特色
《汉语名词动用中的句法机制研究》：教育部人文社会科学研究一般项目（08JC740010）广东省哲学社会科学“十一五”规划项目（08YK-01）资金资助
汉语名词动用中的句法机制研究 目录
序 Acknowledgements Abstract 摘要 Glossary Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 Introduction 1.2 Denominal Verbs in Chinese 1.2.1 The Criteria 1.2.2 The Data 1.2.3 Semantic Properties of DNVs 1.3 Previous Approaches to DNVs 1.3.1 The Lexical/Morphological Approach 1.3.2 The Pragmatic Approach 1.3.3 The Lexical-semantic Approach 1.3.4 The Syntactic Approach 1.3.5 Summary 1.4 Rationale for This Research and Questions to Be Addressed 1.5 A Syntactic Approach to Chinese DNVs: An Overview Chapter 2 The V-bar Pied-piping Hypothesis 2.1 Introduction 2.2 The V-bar Pied-piping Hypothesis 2.2.1 Dative Shift Under Current Theories on Verb-related Movement 2.2.2 The V' Reanalysis Hypothesis 2.2.3 The V-bar Pied-piping Hypothesis 2.2.4 Licensing V-bar Pied-piping 2.3 Explaining Some (A)symmetries of Syntactic Domains 2.4 Explaining Some Natural Word Order Phenomena 2.4.1 Adjuncts 2.4.2 Verb Particles 2.4.3 Extraposition 2.4.4 Inversion 2.5 Deriving Compound Verbs in Chinese 2.5.1 Verb-Directional/-Phase Constructions in Chinese 2.5.2 Verb-Resultative Constructions in Chinese 2.5.3 Light Verb Constructions in Chinese 2.6 Summary Chapter 3 Semantic Light Categories in Chinese 3.1 Introduction 3.2 Light Verbs: Syntactic vs. Semantic 3.2.1 The Meanings of Light Verb 3.2.2 Light Verb v vs. Proto-verbs 3.2.3 Proto-verbs vs. Canonical Verbs 3.2.4 Auxiliary Verbs 3.3 Null Prepositions in Chinese 3.3.1 Variety and Unselectiveness of Verbal Objects 3.3.2 The Null Preposition Hypothesis 3.3.3 Some Consequences 3.4 Summary Chapter 4 Syntactic Derivation of DNVs 4.1 Introduction 4.2 Reclassifying DNVs in Chinese 4.2.1 Aspectual Classes of Verbs 4.2.2 Aspectual Classes of Chinese DNVs 4.3 Deriving DNVs via Syntax 4.3.1 Deriving Sta-DNVs 4.3.2 Deriving Ach-DNVs 4.3.3 Deriving Acc-DNVs 4.3.4 Deriving Act-DNVs 4.4 Summary Chapter 5 Syntax-Induced Properties of DNVs 5.1 Introduction 5.2 The Inter-Class Quantitative Asymmetry 5.3 The Inter-Categorical Asymmetry 5.4 The Pattern of Aspectual Shift with DNVs 5.4.1 State-to-Achievement Shift 5.4.2 Achievement-to-Accomplishment Shift 5.4.3 Accomplishment-to-Achievement Shift 5.4.4 Achievement-to-State Shift 5.4.5 Some Caveats 5.5 Accomplishment Verbs in Chinese 5.5.1 The Traditional View 5.5.2 Object-coerced Accomplishment Verbs 5.5.3 Syntactically-derived Accomplishment Verbs 5.6 Determination of the Aktionsart of DNVs 5.6.1 Definiteness of Objects 5.6.2 Boundedness of Objects 5.6.3 Boundedness of Source Nouns 5.6.4 Proto-verbs 5.7 Eventuality Structure of DNVs 5.7.1 The Singular-headedness of Sta- and Act-DNVs 5.7.2 The Double-headedness of Ach-DNVs 5.7.3 The Triple-headedness of Acc-DNVs 5.8 Semantic Generation of DNVs 5.8.1 The Basics of Generative Lexicon 5.8.2 Generating the Semantics of Sta-DNVs 5.8.3 Generating the Semantics of Ach-DNVs 5.8.4 Generating the Semantics of Acc-DNVs 5.8.5 Generating the Semantics of Act-DNVs 5.8.6 Functioning of Proto-verbs 5.9 Summary Chapter 6 A Comparative Perspective on DNVs 6.1 Introduction 6.2 Asymmetries Between Chinese and English DNVs 6.2.1 Quantitative Asymmetry 6.2.2 Typological Asymmetry 6.2.3 Aspectual Asymmetry 6.3 Potential Parametric Variations 6.3.1 Activity vs. Inertness of Null Preposition P 6.3.2 Prominence vs. Dormancy of Proto-verbs 6.3.3 Applicability of V-bar Pied-piping 6.4 The Account for the Asymmetries 6.4.1 Explaining the Quantitative Asymmetry 6.4.2 Explaining the Typological Asymmetry 6.4.3 Explaining the Aspectual Asymmetry 6.5 Summary Chapter 7 A Diachronic Perspective on Chinese DNVs 7.1 Introduction 7.2 Characteristics of Classical Chinese DNVs 7.3 Light Categories and V-bar Pied-piping in Classical Chinese 7.3.1 Null Prepositions in Classical Chinese Syntax 7.3.2 Proto-verbs in Classical Chinese Syntax 7.3.3 V-bar Pied-piping in Classical Chinese Syntax 7.3.4 Classical Chinese DNVs: A Paradox 7.4 A Minimalist Account 7.4.1 Patterns of Feature Bundling 7.4.2 Strength of Morphemes 7.4.3 The Account 7.5 The Extension of Light Categories from Syntax to Morphology 7.5.1 The Denominal Prefix *s- in Early Archaic Chinese 7.5.2 The Denominal Falling Tone in Middle Archaic Chinese 7.5.3 Denominal Light Categories in Modem Chinese 7.6 Summary Chapter 8 Concluding Remarks 8.1 Major Findings 8.2 Limitations Appendix References
汉语名词动用中的句法机制研究 节选
《汉语名词动用中的句法机制研究》内容简介：Chinese denominal verbs (DNVs for short) are amenable to an L-syntactic analysis, which is accommodated in a theoretical framework that comprises an overt syntactic operation and two light syntactic categories. The former is V-bar pied-piping, i.e. the head V, when it raises, may optionally pied-pipe its Complement, but stranding the Specifier of its Complement. The operation works as an alternative to the standard way for verb movement under certain licensing conditions and enjoys extensive empirical support. The latter includes proto-verbs,which we separate from categories such as the CFC v and auxiliary verbs, and null prepositions, which, in our argument, may mediate between an intransitive verb and a nominal phrase following it.
汉语名词动用中的句法机制研究 相关资料
插图：Hale & Keyser （1993, 1997, 1999） adopt the position that universalgrammar plays a role in specifying the principles that constrain theconstruction of word meanings though it does not specify wordmeanings themselves. So word meanings arise from the interaction oflinguistic predispositions with empirical experience. Basing their ar-gument mainly on an analysis of the semantic structure of DNVs（such as unergative verbs calve, dance, sing, etc. and "put" verbs suchas shelve, corral, saddle, coat, etc.） and of deadjectival verbs （such asclear, widen, etc.）, Hale & Keyser take the semantic construction ofthese verbs to be completely governed by syntactic principles. A verbhas a Lexical Relational Structure （shortened as LRS hereafter）, withinwhich the verb's relation to other constituents is fully determined. TheLSR itself follows from syntactic principles such as Kayne's （1984）Unambiguous Paths, Larson's （1988） Single Complement Hypothesisand Chomsky's （1986） Full Interpretation. "There is no 'thematic roleassignment', apart from predication; and there are no 'thematic roles',apart from the lexical relations expressed in unambiguous, fully in-terpreted projections of elementary lexical categories" （Hale & Keyser1993: 93-4）. The formation of DNVs results from syntactic operationsthat observe the same syntactic principles as basic or underived verbsdo in undergoing syntactic operations. Any violation of syntacticprinciples, e.g. Head Movement Constraint （shortened as HMC here-after）, Empty Category Principle （shortened as ECP hereafter）, etc.,would give rise to "impossible words".
